Comments on: Visa Issues in the News

By: Concerned

Concerned — Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:41:05 +0000

I believe that the reason agency names are not mention is too protect the families who are trying to get there children home. The last thing they need is to have the name of their agency being blasted all over the internet. Corrupt agencies need to be stopped, but in cases where everything was done legally (as in this one) you do not want to give any reason to believe that your agency is corrupt.

By: Melissa

Melissa — Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:38:20 +0000

Why was the agency not mentioned in the article except to say that they were ethical and reputable? I’m getting tired of agencies hiding in the shadows of all this. Every article that I have read about these issues never mentions an agency by name. Am I the only one who finds this a little fishy?

By: Emma

Emma — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 04:59:22 +0000

Julie, I do hope your Madelyn would be in your arm soon. I just correct you that new process of I-600 (not I-600A) has been started to apply in VN since Nov. 2007.

By: Nicole

Nicole — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:33:56 +0000

Julie, many of us are thinking of you and hoping this resolves.

By: Julie Carroll

Julie Carroll — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:42:55 +0000

What this article failed to include was that the new process for advance processing of the I-600A BEFORE families travel to adopt their children was NOT in place until weeks AFTER we returned home. The independent investigation of our case has been completed and there is NO evidence that our daughter does not meet the criteria for orphan status by USCIS. We are now awaiting the submission of our official response from our attorney to USCIS and hope for a successful resolution to our case.
Julie Carroll